<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medcare Forum &#187; ultrasound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medcareforum.com/archives/tag/ultrasound/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medcareforum.com</link>
	<description>Health Care Information, News and Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:19:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Low Blow Against Abortions</title>
		<link>http://medcareforum.com/archives/2008/10/16/low-blow-against-abortions</link>
		<comments>http://medcareforum.com/archives/2008/10/16/low-blow-against-abortions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Milazzo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrasound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medcareforum.com/archives/2008/10/16/low-blow-against-abortions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     Three states in our union already require that ultrasounds be taken and made available to the woman before her abortion. The key words here are made available. Now a fourth state of Oklahoma want to enact the same law, however they want to require that the ultrasound screen face the woman during the ultrasound [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Three states in our union already require that ultrasounds be taken and made available to the woman before her abortion. The key words here are made available. Now a fourth state of Oklahoma want to enact the same law, however they want to require that the ultrasound screen face the woman during the ultrasound procedure and that the doctor point out and describe the fetus and its dimensions to the woman, before they will perform the abortion.</p>
<p>Women who have become pregnant due to rape or incest are not exempt from this law. Government should stay out of the affairs between women and their doctors. This law is being challenged as well it should be. This is nothing but a farce by right to lifers to place so much guilt on a woman that she would keep a fetus that she knows she cannot take care of, raise, or support. When such women are thus guilted into having the baby, then the government and the taxpayers complain that they have to support the child. Or when the child ends up abandoned or abused or even dead, they complain about why did the mother have the child in the first place. Make up your minds. I say that if you are that much against abortions put up or shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medcareforum.com/archives/2008/10/16/low-blow-against-abortions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
