<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medcare Forum &#187; Law suit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medcareforum.com/archives/tag/law-suit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medcareforum.com</link>
	<description>Health Care Information, News and Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:19:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Airbourne Suit</title>
		<link>http://medcareforum.com/archives/2008/08/18/airbourne-suit</link>
		<comments>http://medcareforum.com/archives/2008/08/18/airbourne-suit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Milazzo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medcareforum.com/archives/2008/08/18/airbourne-suit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[      Lydia Parnes, the director of the Federal Trade Commission&#8217;s Bureau of Consumer Protection filed a complaint against the maker&#8217;s of Airbourne, claiming that there is no &#8220;credible evidence&#8221; that Airbourne protects and helps to reduce colds, or protects people from germ exposure.
The FTC wants Airbourne to pay people back for as many as their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>      Lydia Parnes, the director of the Federal Trade Commission&#8217;s Bureau of Consumer Protection filed a complaint against the maker&#8217;s of Airbourne, claiming that there is no &#8220;credible evidence&#8221; that Airbourne protects and helps to reduce colds, or protects people from germ exposure.</p>
<p>The FTC wants Airbourne to pay people back for as many as their last six purchases of the product, which could cost Airbourne a grand total of $30 million.</p>
<p>Airbourne has agreed to a settlement of putting another $6.5 million into funds they already have to pay for a class action suit of the same kind. That suit said that Airbourne made false claims and they settled that one for $23.5 million.</p>
<p>Those of you who bought their products between 2001 and 2008 have till September 15 to apply for a refund which will be paid by October 15.</p>
<p>Airbourne claims that they have changed their packaging and wording and that they are just being victimized by suit hungry lawyers.</p>
<p>Airbourne does have a devoted following who claim that it really does work and that they know it might just be because they believe in it, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to make a difference. They don&#8217;t care how it works, they just know that it does.</p>
<p>I know a couple people who swear by it and claim that when a cold shows it&#8217;s first symptom, they take Airbourne and the cold vanishes immediately. That&#8217;s good for them, it&#8217;s just too bad the placebo is so expensive. I bet the second grade teacher who founded Airbourne isn&#8217;t teaching second grade anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medcareforum.com/archives/2008/08/18/airbourne-suit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
